<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The &#034;Right&#034; Opinion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.booklistonline.com/2006/05/09/the-right-opinion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.booklistonline.com/2006/05/09/the-right-opinion/</link>
	<description>Behind the Book Reviews--The Official Blog of Booklist Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 12:54:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Book Blog - Likely Stories, by Keir Graff - Booklist Online &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Unbound Galleys Revisited</title>
		<link>http://blog.booklistonline.com/2006/05/09/the-right-opinion/comment-page-1/#comment-120546</link>
		<dc:creator>Book Blog - Likely Stories, by Keir Graff - Booklist Online &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Unbound Galleys Revisited</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.booklistonline.com/?p=312#comment-120546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The book I&#8217;m reading so precariously, by the way, is The Last Match by David Dodge. It&#8217;s published by Hard Case Crime, and unbound galleys or no, I always look forward to what they send. Aside from one title that I had mixed feelings about, I&#8217;ve liked-often loved-all the Hard Case Crime books I&#8217;ve reviewed. I&#8217;ve even read some that weren&#8217;t assigned, just for fun. Publisher Charles Ardai has shown a remarkable eye for both great reprints and great new books that read like the old ones. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The book I&#8217;m reading so precariously, by the way, is The Last Match by David Dodge. It&#8217;s published by Hard Case Crime, and unbound galleys or no, I always look forward to what they send. Aside from one title that I had mixed feelings about, I&#8217;ve liked-often loved-all the Hard Case Crime books I&#8217;ve reviewed. I&#8217;ve even read some that weren&#8217;t assigned, just for fun. Publisher Charles Ardai has shown a remarkable eye for both great reprints and great new books that read like the old ones. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Likely Stories &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Antiqued Prose</title>
		<link>http://blog.booklistonline.com/2006/05/09/the-right-opinion/comment-page-1/#comment-259</link>
		<dc:creator>Likely Stories &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Antiqued Prose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 02:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.booklistonline.com/?p=312#comment-259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] In a weird way, I didn&#8217;t mind putting it off, because I was thinking I&#8217;d really like it, and it&#8217;s always nice to have something to look forward to. As I&#8217;ve written before, I try to avoid reading anything about the book except the book, but a glance at the cover and the first few pages led me to hope that this would be something right up my alley. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In a weird way, I didn&#8217;t mind putting it off, because I was thinking I&#8217;d really like it, and it&#8217;s always nice to have something to look forward to. As I&#8217;ve written before, I try to avoid reading anything about the book except the book, but a glance at the cover and the first few pages led me to hope that this would be something right up my alley. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Likely Stories &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Damnation Street</title>
		<link>http://blog.booklistonline.com/2006/05/09/the-right-opinion/comment-page-1/#comment-227</link>
		<dc:creator>Likely Stories &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Damnation Street</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 20:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.booklistonline.com/?p=312#comment-227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Recently I&#8217;ve written about not loving a book everyone else seems to love, a mostly good anthology with a few clanks, and deciding not to star a review by a favorite author. I sound like a lot of fun, don&#8217;t I? [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Recently I&#8217;ve written about not loving a book everyone else seems to love, a mostly good anthology with a few clanks, and deciding not to star a review by a favorite author. I sound like a lot of fun, don&#8217;t I? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Likely Stories &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Damnation Street</title>
		<link>http://blog.booklistonline.com/2006/05/09/the-right-opinion/comment-page-1/#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator>Likely Stories &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Damnation Street</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 18:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.booklistonline.com/?p=312#comment-206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] &#171; The &quot;Right&quot; Opinion 175 Words &#187; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &laquo; The &#34;Right&#34; Opinion 175 Words &raquo; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Likely Stories &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Power of Pride</title>
		<link>http://blog.booklistonline.com/2006/05/09/the-right-opinion/comment-page-1/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>Likely Stories &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Power of Pride</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 18:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.booklistonline.com/?p=312#comment-198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] There&#8217;s insecurity (do I seem smart enough? do I have the right opinion)? and its cousin, pride (my opinion is important!). Honestly, thinking about it too much is enough to make a book reviewer afraid to review books. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There&#8217;s insecurity (do I seem smart enough? do I have the right opinion)? and its cousin, pride (my opinion is important!). Honestly, thinking about it too much is enough to make a book reviewer afraid to review books. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Likely Stories &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Unbound Galleys Revisited</title>
		<link>http://blog.booklistonline.com/2006/05/09/the-right-opinion/comment-page-1/#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>Likely Stories &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Unbound Galleys Revisited</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 17:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.booklistonline.com/?p=312#comment-186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The book I&#8217;m reading so precariously, by the way, is The Last Match by David Dodge. It&#8217;s published by Hard Case Crime, and unbound galleys or no, I always look forward to what they send. Aside from one title that I had mixed feelings about, I&#8217;ve liked-often loved-all the Hard Case Crime books I&#8217;ve reviewed. I&#8217;ve even read some that weren&#8217;t assigned, just for fun. Publisher Charles Ardai has shown a remarkable eye for both great reprints and great new books that read like the old ones. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The book I&#8217;m reading so precariously, by the way, is The Last Match by David Dodge. It&#8217;s published by Hard Case Crime, and unbound galleys or no, I always look forward to what they send. Aside from one title that I had mixed feelings about, I&#8217;ve liked-often loved-all the Hard Case Crime books I&#8217;ve reviewed. I&#8217;ve even read some that weren&#8217;t assigned, just for fun. Publisher Charles Ardai has shown a remarkable eye for both great reprints and great new books that read like the old ones. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Ardai</title>
		<link>http://blog.booklistonline.com/2006/05/09/the-right-opinion/comment-page-1/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Ardai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.booklistonline.com/?p=312#comment-134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obviously, no book is so perfect that everyone loves it; there are always some dissenters, and that&#039;s probably for the best.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the case of BUST, we haven&#039;t gotten a single negative review yet (not even yours: you wrote &quot;Crosses and double-crosses, miscalculations and blunders, and plenty of dead bodies...For those who like the bungling-criminal genre, this is good fun&quot;; that may not be a rave, but it&#039;s hardly what I&#039;d call a negative review).  But we&#039;ve had other books - even ones that have been nominated for or won major awards - that have gotten a dozen extremely positive reviews and one viciously negative one.  Obviously those books weren&#039;t bad books in an absolute sense, they just pushed some individual reviewers&#039; buttons in the wrong way, producing these idiosyncratic &quot;outlier&quot; reviews.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But are the outlier reviews &quot;wrong&quot;?  Not if they accurately reflect those readers&#039; feelings about the book.  If a reviewer consistently expresses opinions with which readers disagree, those readers are free to stop reading the reviewer (or at least to disregard his recommendations); but that doesn&#039;t mean the opinions are wrong or shouldn&#039;t be expressed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As a publisher, would I rather not have those negative reviews?  No.  I want to see the full range of opinions on everything we do, honestly and persuasively presented.  That&#039;s a reviewer&#039;s job.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That said, when we are fortunate enough to receive almost unanimous raves for a book we publish, it&#039;s our job as a publisher to let readers know about it - specifically, to let readers know that a fairly diverse set of critics (who, given the realities of lead time, may themselves not have been influenced by reading each other&#039;s reviews any more than you were) all enjoyed a new book of ours quite a lot, and that therefore it&#039;s at least statistically likely that readers will enjoy it as well.  (When even your most negative review calls your book &quot;good fun,&quot; you&#039;re probably doing something right.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;-Charles]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously, no book is so perfect that everyone loves it; there are always some dissenters, and that&#8217;s probably for the best.  </p>
<p>In the case of BUST, we haven&#8217;t gotten a single negative review yet (not even yours: you wrote &#8220;Crosses and double-crosses, miscalculations and blunders, and plenty of dead bodies&#8230;For those who like the bungling-criminal genre, this is good fun&#8221;; that may not be a rave, but it&#8217;s hardly what I&#8217;d call a negative review).  But we&#8217;ve had other books &#8211; even ones that have been nominated for or won major awards &#8211; that have gotten a dozen extremely positive reviews and one viciously negative one.  Obviously those books weren&#8217;t bad books in an absolute sense, they just pushed some individual reviewers&#8217; buttons in the wrong way, producing these idiosyncratic &#8220;outlier&#8221; reviews.</p>
<p>But are the outlier reviews &#8220;wrong&#8221;?  Not if they accurately reflect those readers&#8217; feelings about the book.  If a reviewer consistently expresses opinions with which readers disagree, those readers are free to stop reading the reviewer (or at least to disregard his recommendations); but that doesn&#8217;t mean the opinions are wrong or shouldn&#8217;t be expressed.</p>
<p>As a publisher, would I rather not have those negative reviews?  No.  I want to see the full range of opinions on everything we do, honestly and persuasively presented.  That&#8217;s a reviewer&#8217;s job.  </p>
<p>That said, when we are fortunate enough to receive almost unanimous raves for a book we publish, it&#8217;s our job as a publisher to let readers know about it &#8211; specifically, to let readers know that a fairly diverse set of critics (who, given the realities of lead time, may themselves not have been influenced by reading each other&#8217;s reviews any more than you were) all enjoyed a new book of ours quite a lot, and that therefore it&#8217;s at least statistically likely that readers will enjoy it as well.  (When even your most negative review calls your book &#8220;good fun,&#8221; you&#8217;re probably doing something right.)</p>
<p>-Charles</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keir</title>
		<link>http://blog.booklistonline.com/2006/05/09/the-right-opinion/comment-page-1/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>Keir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.booklistonline.com/?p=312#comment-135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the comment, Charles. I&#039;m sure I could have picked a better example to discuss the &quot;outlier&quot; phenomenon - you&#039;re right that my review of &lt;em&gt;Bust&lt;/em&gt; wasn&#039;t all negative - but when your newsletter arrived, the raves made my praise feel pretty pale, and thus a blog topic was born.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;You raise a good point about readers&#039; relationships with reviewers: I think we all have reviewers whom we like or trust more than others, and their honesty and consistency make it easier for us to choose them.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Most of my reviews of Hard Case Crime books have been extremely positive, so I do think you&#039;re doing a lot right - though I&#039;ll always reserve the right to offer a different opinion!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment, Charles. I&#8217;m sure I could have picked a better example to discuss the &#8220;outlier&#8221; phenomenon &#8211; you&#8217;re right that my review of <em>Bust</em> wasn&#8217;t all negative &#8211; but when your newsletter arrived, the raves made my praise feel pretty pale, and thus a blog topic was born.</p>
<p>You raise a good point about readers&#8217; relationships with reviewers: I think we all have reviewers whom we like or trust more than others, and their honesty and consistency make it easier for us to choose them.</p>
<p>Most of my reviews of Hard Case Crime books have been extremely positive, so I do think you&#8217;re doing a lot right &#8211; though I&#8217;ll always reserve the right to offer a different opinion!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Sennett</title>
		<link>http://blog.booklistonline.com/2006/05/09/the-right-opinion/comment-page-1/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Sennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.booklistonline.com/?p=312#comment-136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The only thing I&#039;d add to Keir&#039;s discussion of &quot;The Da Vinci Code&quot; review was that, when the book became such a phenomenon, I was especially glad I worked hard to make that a well-written review. You&#039;d hate to have the review of such a prominent book turn out to be the one you dashed off while recovering from a nasty head cold and running late for a root canal...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only thing I&#8217;d add to Keir&#8217;s discussion of &#8220;The Da Vinci Code&#8221; review was that, when the book became such a phenomenon, I was especially glad I worked hard to make that a well-written review. You&#8217;d hate to have the review of such a prominent book turn out to be the one you dashed off while recovering from a nasty head cold and running late for a root canal&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Ott</title>
		<link>http://blog.booklistonline.com/2006/05/09/the-right-opinion/comment-page-1/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Ott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.booklistonline.com/?p=312#comment-137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About Frank Sennett&#039;s Da Vinci Code review, not only was it perceptive and well-written, but I&#039;m beginning to think it captures what a lot of readers feel about the book. At recent conferences demonstrating Booklist Online, I often did a search for Da Vinci Code and, when Frank&#039;s review came up, made a joke about Booklist being one of the few journals that didn&#039;t rave about the book. Everytime I said that, the librarian I was talking to replied that she didn&#039;t think it was as good as its hype either.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About Frank Sennett&#8217;s Da Vinci Code review, not only was it perceptive and well-written, but I&#8217;m beginning to think it captures what a lot of readers feel about the book. At recent conferences demonstrating Booklist Online, I often did a search for Da Vinci Code and, when Frank&#8217;s review came up, made a joke about Booklist being one of the few journals that didn&#8217;t rave about the book. Everytime I said that, the librarian I was talking to replied that she didn&#8217;t think it was as good as its hype either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
