<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Greedy Hippies</title>
	<link>http://blog.booklistonline.com/2006/05/17/greedy-hippies/</link>
	<description>Behind the Book Reviews--The Official Blog of Booklist Online</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 11:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Likely Stories &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Problematization of Plot</title>
		<link>http://blog.booklistonline.com/2006/05/17/greedy-hippies/#comment-229</link>
		<dc:creator>Likely Stories &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Problematization of Plot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 20:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.booklistonline.com/2006/05/17/greedy-hippies/#comment-229</guid>
		<description>[...] While I was writing (that is, &#8220;blogging&#8221;) about Robert Ward&#8217;s Four Kinds of Rain yesterday, I was trying to make sure I didn&#8217;t say too much about what actually happens in the story, which is also a key consideration when writing a review. One of the frustrating things about being a book reviewer is that, if I don&#8217;t want to be the jerk who spoils it for everyone - I might sometimes want to be another kind of jerk, but definitely not that kind - I can&#8217;t get too specific about things. Using specific examples is essential to good expository writing, but book reviews must balance the sometimes competing imperatives of making an argument and piquing readers&#8217; interest. And if readers know what&#8217;s going to happen, they&#8217;re less likely to pick up the book. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] While I was writing (that is, &#8220;blogging&#8221;) about Robert Ward&#8217;s Four Kinds of Rain yesterday, I was trying to make sure I didn&#8217;t say too much about what actually happens in the story, which is also a key consideration when writing a review. One of the frustrating things about being a book reviewer is that, if I don&#8217;t want to be the jerk who spoils it for everyone - I might sometimes want to be another kind of jerk, but definitely not that kind - I can&#8217;t get too specific about things. Using specific examples is essential to good expository writing, but book reviews must balance the sometimes competing imperatives of making an argument and piquing readers&#8217; interest. And if readers know what&#8217;s going to happen, they&#8217;re less likely to pick up the book. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
