<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Review Remains the Same</title>
	<link>http://blog.booklistonline.com/2006/08/08/the-review-remains-the-same/</link>
	<description>Behind the Book Reviews--The Official Blog of Booklist Online</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 00:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Likely Stories &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Trouble with Short Stories</title>
		<link>http://blog.booklistonline.com/2006/08/08/the-review-remains-the-same/#comment-242</link>
		<dc:creator>Likely Stories &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Trouble with Short Stories</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 16:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.booklistonline.com/2006/08/08/the-review-remains-the-same/#comment-242</guid>
		<description>[...] At any rate, Swierczynski&#8217;s third book is great. I felt a bit as if I was rewriting my review of The Wheel Man, because both books share many of the same qualities. But, as I wrote in my last post, Swierczynski does up the ante with a more inventive plot this time around. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] At any rate, Swierczynski&#8217;s third book is great. I felt a bit as if I was rewriting my review of The Wheel Man, because both books share many of the same qualities. But, as I wrote in my last post, Swierczynski does up the ante with a more inventive plot this time around. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Likely Stories &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Review Templates</title>
		<link>http://blog.booklistonline.com/2006/08/08/the-review-remains-the-same/#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>Likely Stories &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Review Templates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 21:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.booklistonline.com/2006/08/08/the-review-remains-the-same/#comment-237</guid>
		<description>[...] Something I&#8217;d meant to add yesterday was that, even though every book is different, the similarities in the way I frame some of the reviews can almost make it feel like I&#8217;ve unconsciously created templates for them. There&#8217;s the First-Novelist-Shows-Promise template and its twin, Promising-Novelist-Can&#8217;t-Deliver-in-Sophomore-Effort. There&#8217;s also Usually-Good-Novelist-Isn&#8217;t-Quite-So-Good-This-Time. Then there&#8217;s Great-Novelist-Is-Great-Once-Again-Making-Us-All-Feel-Somewhat-Inferior. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Something I&#8217;d meant to add yesterday was that, even though every book is different, the similarities in the way I frame some of the reviews can almost make it feel like I&#8217;ve unconsciously created templates for them. There&#8217;s the First-Novelist-Shows-Promise template and its twin, Promising-Novelist-Can&#8217;t-Deliver-in-Sophomore-Effort. There&#8217;s also Usually-Good-Novelist-Isn&#8217;t-Quite-So-Good-This-Time. Then there&#8217;s Great-Novelist-Is-Great-Once-Again-Making-Us-All-Feel-Somewhat-Inferior. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Likely Stories &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Review Templates</title>
		<link>http://blog.booklistonline.com/2006/08/08/the-review-remains-the-same/#comment-185</link>
		<dc:creator>Likely Stories &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Review Templates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 17:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.booklistonline.com/2006/08/08/the-review-remains-the-same/#comment-185</guid>
		<description>[...] &#171; The Review Remains the Same Unbound Galleys Revisited &#187; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] &laquo; The Review Remains the Same Unbound Galleys Revisited &raquo; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Hooper</title>
		<link>http://blog.booklistonline.com/2006/08/08/the-review-remains-the-same/#comment-175</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Hooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.booklistonline.com/2006/08/08/the-review-remains-the-same/#comment-175</guid>
		<description>Hey, I'm your editor. Let's be honest here. Sometimes it's taken you 180 words to say a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I&#8217;m your editor. Let&#8217;s be honest here. Sometimes it&#8217;s taken you 180 words to say a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cindy Dobrez</title>
		<link>http://blog.booklistonline.com/2006/08/08/the-review-remains-the-same/#comment-176</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy Dobrez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.booklistonline.com/2006/08/08/the-review-remains-the-same/#comment-176</guid>
		<description>We're all going to want a blog space to add an extra 500 words to our 175 word limit at this rate-as long as it doesn't come with a wakeful newborn!  Sorry, Brad, but I was really hoping that the posted comment would be Bill's funny story that Keir hinted at...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re all going to want a blog space to add an extra 500 words to our 175 word limit at this rate-as long as it doesn&#8217;t come with a wakeful newborn!  Sorry, Brad, but I was really hoping that the posted comment would be Bill&#8217;s funny story that Keir hinted at&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keir</title>
		<link>http://blog.booklistonline.com/2006/08/08/the-review-remains-the-same/#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>Keir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.booklistonline.com/2006/08/08/the-review-remains-the-same/#comment-177</guid>
		<description>Bill's probably thinking, &lt;em&gt;What story?&lt;/em&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(Admit it, Brad, those 180-word reviews are 2.857% better!)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill&#8217;s probably thinking, <em>What story?</em> </p>
<p>(Admit it, Brad, those 180-word reviews are 2.857% better!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Hooper</title>
		<link>http://blog.booklistonline.com/2006/08/08/the-review-remains-the-same/#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Hooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.booklistonline.com/2006/08/08/the-review-remains-the-same/#comment-178</guid>
		<description>Indeed. (Sorry, Cindy, for intruding again!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed. (Sorry, Cindy, for intruding again!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://blog.booklistonline.com/2006/08/08/the-review-remains-the-same/#comment-179</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.booklistonline.com/2006/08/08/the-review-remains-the-same/#comment-179</guid>
		<description>I guess I've been outed. Before I tell my purportedly funny story, let me say that Keir really nails this issue. It's a constantly perplexing one, especially with series titles: You have an overall reading of the series, a sense of where it fits, and you feel a need to restate that so that new readers will know where you're coming from. But, damn, there's only so many ways to say it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Which is the problem I ran into with James Lee Burke, whom I've been reviewing for years and like very much. At some point in the 90s, I reviewed a new Burke novel and felt quite good about my review, thinking I'd really said what needed to be said about Dave Robicheaux. Well, maybe I had, but I'd said exactly the same thing in my previous review of a Robicheaux. I was in a hurry, I guess-didn't have Booklist Online to consult quickly-and didn't check my old reviews before writing the new one. When I did, it was almost identical, right down to the lead, something about Robicheaux fighting a losing battle agaisnt the evils of modernity. In today's world, some Plagiarism Nazi on the Web would have convicted me in 15 minutes of stealing from myself.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But did I? I'd completely forgotten what I'd said the first time and simply said it again, proving either that I'm not very imaginative or that I was right in the beginning. Fortunately, I think those reviews predate Booklist Online-at least I couldn't find two in a row with the same lead-and when we add older stuff, I'll be sure to edit.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And frankly, Cindy, I think Brad's comment about Keir needing 180 words to say something really good was much funnier than this long-winded ramble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I&#8217;ve been outed. Before I tell my purportedly funny story, let me say that Keir really nails this issue. It&#8217;s a constantly perplexing one, especially with series titles: You have an overall reading of the series, a sense of where it fits, and you feel a need to restate that so that new readers will know where you&#8217;re coming from. But, damn, there&#8217;s only so many ways to say it.</p>
<p>Which is the problem I ran into with James Lee Burke, whom I&#8217;ve been reviewing for years and like very much. At some point in the 90s, I reviewed a new Burke novel and felt quite good about my review, thinking I&#8217;d really said what needed to be said about Dave Robicheaux. Well, maybe I had, but I&#8217;d said exactly the same thing in my previous review of a Robicheaux. I was in a hurry, I guess-didn&#8217;t have Booklist Online to consult quickly-and didn&#8217;t check my old reviews before writing the new one. When I did, it was almost identical, right down to the lead, something about Robicheaux fighting a losing battle agaisnt the evils of modernity. In today&#8217;s world, some Plagiarism Nazi on the Web would have convicted me in 15 minutes of stealing from myself.</p>
<p>But did I? I&#8217;d completely forgotten what I&#8217;d said the first time and simply said it again, proving either that I&#8217;m not very imaginative or that I was right in the beginning. Fortunately, I think those reviews predate Booklist Online-at least I couldn&#8217;t find two in a row with the same lead-and when we add older stuff, I&#8217;ll be sure to edit.</p>
<p>And frankly, Cindy, I think Brad&#8217;s comment about Keir needing 180 words to say something really good was much funnier than this long-winded ramble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
