<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dave Eggers vs. Dave Eggers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.booklistonline.com/2006/12/04/dave-eggers-vs-dave-eggers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.booklistonline.com/2006/12/04/dave-eggers-vs-dave-eggers/</link>
	<description>Behind the Book Reviews--The Official Blog of Booklist Online</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Likely Stories &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Regrets and Reversals</title>
		<link>http://blog.booklistonline.com/2006/12/04/dave-eggers-vs-dave-eggers/comment-page-1/#comment-1474</link>
		<dc:creator>Likely Stories &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Regrets and Reversals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 18:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.booklistonline.com/2006/12/04/dave-eggers-vs-dave-eggers/#comment-1474</guid>
		<description>[...] The Sunday before last, the Chicago Tribune&#8217;sÂ critics offered a number of critical reversals&#8211;&#8221;revisions and reassessments&#8221; of works they&#8217;d previously panned or praised.Â It&#8217;s a topic I&#8217;d been meaningÂ to write about myself, and I&#8217;d been mulling it over for a few days when I stumbled across the Eggers vs. Eggers controversy&#8211;Eggers&#8217; striking change of heart regarding David Foster Wallace&#8217;s Infinite Jest. Second thoughts seem to be on our minds as we approach the end of the year. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Sunday before last, the Chicago Tribune&#8217;sÂ critics offered a number of critical reversals&#8211;&#8221;revisions and reassessments&#8221; of works they&#8217;d previously panned or praised.Â It&#8217;s a topic I&#8217;d been meaningÂ to write about myself, and I&#8217;d been mulling it over for a few days when I stumbled across the Eggers vs. Eggers controversy&#8211;Eggers&#8217; striking change of heart regarding David Foster Wallace&#8217;s Infinite Jest. Second thoughts seem to be on our minds as we approach the end of the year. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
