Book Blog – Likely Stories, from Booklist Online » Blog Archive » Will the JT Leroy verdict set a precedent?
Booklist Online

Booklist Online: More than 130,000 book reviews for librarians, book groups, and book lovers - from the trusted experts at the American Library Association

| | | | | | | | | | |
Book Blog - Likely Stories, by Keir Graff - Booklist Online

Likely Stories

A Booklist Blog
Keir Graff and editors from Booklist's adult and youth departments write candidly about books, book reviewing, and the publishing industry

« »

Tuesday, July 3, 2007 10:05 am
Will the JT Leroy verdict set a precedent?
Posted by: Keir Graff

Galleycat had an interesting take on the Laura Albert/JT Leroy verdict last week (“But What If “JT Leroy” Wasn’t a Fraud?“):

Even if one maintains reservations on the appropriateness of the lengths Albert went to in order to ensure “JT” was the public face of her work – and acknowledging the point that signing a contract under a, let’s say, extra-legal name probably isn’t the most kosher of actions – if we’re going to start finding fraud in authors choosing literary personae at odds with their material realities… well, let’s just say it’s not exactly a healthy precedent.

It’s an excellent point. It would be extremely troubling if authors started getting sued en masse because the way they represent themselves isn’t exactly true. (You mean you’re not really a vampire who wears sunglasses and rides motorcycles?!) Remember that this has to do not with James Frey-like inaccuracies in a memoir – the book in question, Sarah, was a novel — but with the fact that the author whose sensational story helped sell the book did not, in fact, exist.

The particulars of this case, however, are so unique that it seems highly unlikely it could be used as a precedent. (Full disclosure: I am not a lawyer.) Probably the judge should have told everyone to go home before it even went to trial, but I find myself in the strange position of sympathizing with the movie producers who thought they were getting a hot property. After all, art and artist seem inextricably entwined these days. And even if Sarah is a good novel on its own merits, would it have gotten the same kind of attention without the mysterious persona of its author? The meta-movie solution proposed by the plaintiff does have kind of a twisted brilliance, acknowledging the true nature of the original deal: what they wanted was a movie based on a book written by a person of note. And Laura Albert is suddenly far more interesting than JT Leroy.

But all those arguments aside, and as Galleycat notes, it could come down simply to the fact that the name on the dotted line wasn’t connected to a real person. Surely that can’t be a legal contract.

But who knows? Maybe Tucker Max will be sued once it’s revealed that he’s actually a 40-year-old virgin.

Which would leave me conflicted. Certainly someone should sue him for something. But then again . . .



One Response to “Will the JT Leroy verdict set a precedent?”
  1. Likely Stories » Blog Archive » Albert in Triple Trouble Says:

    [...] More bad news for Laura Albert. Let this be a warning to women who want to pretend to be male truck-stop prostitutes in order to get publishing deals. From the Associated Press (”Writer told to pay triple legal fees“): NEW YORK – Author Laura Albert must pay nearly $350,000 in legal fees, triple the amount a jury said she owes a production company for duping it with a novel supposedly based on the life of a prostitute named JT LeRoy, a judge has ruled. [...]

Leave a Reply

© 2014 Booklist Online. Powered by WordPress.
Quoted material should be attributed to:
Keir Graff, Likely Stories (Booklist Online).

American Library Association