<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So the ALA, Microsoft, and France walk into a bar&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.booklistonline.com/2007/12/05/so-the-ala-microsoft-and-france-walk-into-a-bar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.booklistonline.com/2007/12/05/so-the-ala-microsoft-and-france-walk-into-a-bar/</link>
	<description>Behind the Book Reviews--The Official Blog of Booklist Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2013 16:38:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keir</title>
		<link>http://blog.booklistonline.com/2007/12/05/so-the-ala-microsoft-and-france-walk-into-a-bar/comment-page-1/#comment-87671</link>
		<dc:creator>Keir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 18:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.booklistonline.com/2007/12/05/so-the-ala-microsoft-and-france-walk-into-a-bar/#comment-87671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess I ended with a question because I&#039;m not so sure myself. As a BookPerson(TM), I definitely support the idea of supporting books that appeal to even a small readership...and many books that are now considered classics began their public existence with three-digit print runs. They can&#039;t be discovered unless they exist in the first place.

But I disagree with Last&#039;s contention that &quot;whether or not a book has readers matters little&quot;. It does matter. A book that has world-changing ideas can&#039;t change the world if the world can&#039;t find it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I ended with a question because I&#8217;m not so sure myself. As a BookPerson(TM), I definitely support the idea of supporting books that appeal to even a small readership&#8230;and many books that are now considered classics began their public existence with three-digit print runs. They can&#8217;t be discovered unless they exist in the first place.</p>
<p>But I disagree with Last&#8217;s contention that &#8220;whether or not a book has readers matters little&#8221;. It does matter. A book that has world-changing ideas can&#8217;t change the world if the world can&#8217;t find it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol Kania</title>
		<link>http://blog.booklistonline.com/2007/12/05/so-the-ala-microsoft-and-france-walk-into-a-bar/comment-page-1/#comment-87667</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol Kania</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 18:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.booklistonline.com/2007/12/05/so-the-ala-microsoft-and-france-walk-into-a-bar/#comment-87667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry to answer your (very thought-provoking) question with more questions, but are books like insurance, in that it&#039;s good to have them around even if they&#039;re never used? Or, are they like stocks or real estate, essentially worthless until they&#039;re put into circulation?

From a selfish point of view, I have (I hope) many, many years on this planet to fill and I like knowing that there will always be books to read. On the other hand, as a taxpayer, I have to wonder why libraries should purchase materials that sit unused (well, I really don&#039;t believe that. I am playing Devil&#039;s Taxpayer here).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to answer your (very thought-provoking) question with more questions, but are books like insurance, in that it&#8217;s good to have them around even if they&#8217;re never used? Or, are they like stocks or real estate, essentially worthless until they&#8217;re put into circulation?</p>
<p>From a selfish point of view, I have (I hope) many, many years on this planet to fill and I like knowing that there will always be books to read. On the other hand, as a taxpayer, I have to wonder why libraries should purchase materials that sit unused (well, I really don&#8217;t believe that. I am playing Devil&#8217;s Taxpayer here).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
