Book Blog – Likely Stories, from Booklist Online » Blog Archive » Quickly: Booker, Rushdie, Rowling, Palin, Challenged Books
Booklist Online

Booklist Online: More than 130,000 book reviews for librarians, book groups, and book lovers - from the trusted experts at the American Library Association

| | | | | | | | | | |
Book Blog - Likely Stories, by Keir Graff - Booklist Online

Likely Stories

A Booklist Blog
Keir Graff and editors from Booklist's adult and youth departments write candidly about books, book reviewing, and the publishing industry

« »

Wednesday, September 10, 2008 2:30 pm
Quickly: Booker, Rushdie, Rowling, Palin, Challenged Books
Posted by: Keir Graff

The Booker shortlist has been announced: Aravind Adiga (The White Tiger), Sebastian Barry (The Secret Scripture), Amitav Ghosh (Sea of Poppies), Linda Grant (The Clothes on Their Backs), Philip Hensher (The Northern Clemency), Steve Toltz (A Fraction of the Whole)–but no Salman Rushdie (The Enchantress of Florence). Why not? The book wasn’t good enough (“Rushdie ‘not good enough’ for Booker shortlist,” by Michelle Pauli and Alison Flood, The Guardian). Not sure about the quotes in that headline, though–they seem to be quoting the authors of the article, not the judges of the contest.

Faring better are two first novelists, although Barry is currently a 2/1 favorite (“First-timers seeking Booker glory,” BBC). Again, not sure about that headline. Did they write their books specifically for the Booker? If you’re not Bookered out by now, you may enjoy scrolling through 40 years of Behind the Bookers (“Tears, tiffs, and triumphs,” The Guardian). They certainly don’t make judges like Rebecca West any more:

“Miss Murdoch writes good and bad novels in alternate years,” she said. “This is a bad year.” Muriel Spark: “clever but too playful.” And out they went.

In other news, the case of  J. K. Rowling and the Adoring Librarian has been adjudicated, and it appears that the plucky young author, Ms. Rowling, has escaped with her intellectual property intact. Reported, appropriately enough, in the Financial Times (“Harry Potter author wins case,” by Matthew Garrahan in Los Angeles). Saying she “took no pleasure” in the lawsuit, she then retreated to her castle, where she peered into her crystal ball, seeking out other would-be authors in their bedroom and basement offices. The authors will be defended by a plucky band of hobbits, dwarves, and sentient woodland creatures–emake that The Right to Write Fund (“Right to Write Fund to Back Creative Artists,” by Jim Milliot, Publishers Weekly).

The list of books that Sarah Palin allegedly wished to remove from the library was bogus. I could have told you that, which is why I never linked to it in the first place. But if you want more details, visit Galleycat, who refers you to the Mat-Su Valley Frontiersman (“Palin: Library censorship inquiries ‘Rhetorical,’” by Paul Stuart, not the clothier).

Far less rhetorical: ALA’s 10 Most Challenged Books of 2007.



2 Responses to “Quickly: Booker, Rushdie, Rowling, Palin, Challenged Books”
  1. Pete Says:

    I highly doubt that Palin’s question was rhetorical. You don’t ask a librarian about how to go about banning books just to pass the time of day.

  2. Keir Says:

    Maybe it’s the same level of rhetoric employed by the guy who asks you, “How would you like a punch in the face?”

Leave a Reply

© 2014 Booklist Online. Powered by WordPress.
Quoted material should be attributed to:
Keir Graff, Likely Stories (Booklist Online).

American Library Association