<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two Likely Stories</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.booklistonline.com/2008/10/28/two-likely-stories/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.booklistonline.com/2008/10/28/two-likely-stories/</link>
	<description>Behind the Book Reviews--The Official Blog of Booklist Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2013 16:38:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Book Blog - Likely Stories, by Keir Graff - Booklist Online &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Do British publishers want to protect their rear ends—or their bottom lines?</title>
		<link>http://blog.booklistonline.com/2008/10/28/two-likely-stories/comment-page-1/#comment-365851</link>
		<dc:creator>Book Blog - Likely Stories, by Keir Graff - Booklist Online &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Do British publishers want to protect their rear ends—or their bottom lines?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 19:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.booklistonline.com/2008/10/28/two-likely-stories/#comment-365851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] I was unaware or had forgotten that Gibson Square hadn&#8217;t gotten around to publishing the book&#8211;I thought they had responded to the attack with brave words about carrying on with a stiff upper lip and so forth. But Flood&#8217;s article does raise an interesting point: that, controversy aside, the book may not be very good. (For more on that, see this.) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I was unaware or had forgotten that Gibson Square hadn&#8217;t gotten around to publishing the book&#8211;I thought they had responded to the attack with brave words about carrying on with a stiff upper lip and so forth. But Flood&#8217;s article does raise an interesting point: that, controversy aside, the book may not be very good. (For more on that, see this.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
