Book Blog – Likely Stories, from Booklist Online » Blog Archive » A Surprising New Threat to Children’s Literacy
Booklist Online

Booklist Online: More than 130,000 book reviews for librarians, book groups, and book lovers - from the trusted experts at the American Library Association

| | | | | | | | | | |
Book Blog - Likely Stories, by Keir Graff - Booklist Online

Likely Stories

A Booklist Blog
Keir Graff and editors from Booklist's adult and youth departments write candidly about books, book reviewing, and the publishing industry

« »

Tuesday, December 16, 2008 11:14 am
A Surprising New Threat to Children’s Literacy
Posted by: Keir Graff

Usually, if I want to read criticism of the ALA and its works, I need look no farther than the Library Journal website. But, this fall, as the Washington Post reports (“Plot Twist,” by Valerie Strauss), attacks have been coming from unlikely quarters:

John Beach, associate professor of literacy education at St. John’s University in New York, studied 30 years of book lists chosen by children and adults. He found that less than 5 percent overlap between the Children’s Choice Awards — named every year by the International Reading Association — and the library association’s annual Notable Children’s Books list, which includes many Newbery and Caldecott winners.

Books prized by children had stories and characters “accessible” to their lives, Beach’s report concluded. “The Newbery has probably done far more to turn kids off to reading than any other book award in children’s publishing,” he said.

I like the way he softened the remark with a “probably”–it’s like saying, “That drunk driver was probably responsible for the deaths of that family he ran over.” Also, it implies that there are other serious contenders. Inquiring minds want to know who they are.

I agree that the 5 percent overlap is worth discussing. And, as we all know, awards, no matter how prestigious, are highly subjective. I’d say they sometimes get it wrong, but every award winner is wrong for some part of its audience.

But, above all–really? The Newbery makes kids hate reading? As I see it from my highly subjective point of view, learning is supposed to be challenging. If the Newbery pick reflected the kinds of books that kids already like and are already reading, what has been gained? Wouldn’t that be kind of like a certificate of participation? Kids are already reading the kinds of books they like to read–adults are supposed to broaden their horizons by trying to pick the best things they can read. Granted, the adults areĀ adults, so there’s a built-in disconnect. But if it weren’t for my youthful attempts to emulate the reading tastes of better readers, I’d still be reading the Hardy Boys. Not that there’s anything wrong with that, but, you know.



2 Responses to “A Surprising New Threat to Children’s Literacy”
  1. Nancy Silverrod Says:

    I devoured Newbery books as a kid, and still read them every year. I haven’t managed to read all of them yet, but I find that I am getting a lot out of many of the lesser-known winners and honor books as I read or re-read. Newbery books are not too challenging for most readers. Some non- or reluctant-readers may need to be sold through some good book-talking, but that’s our job!

  2. Book Blog - Likely Stories, by Keir Graff - Booklist Online » Blog Archive » Perls of Wisdom Says:

    [...] Exactly. [...]

Leave a Reply

© 2014 Booklist Online. Powered by WordPress.
Quoted material should be attributed to:
Keir Graff, Likely Stories (Booklist Online).

American Library Association